Blowhards on Fox News like Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity think they are the guardians of the meaning of Christmas. They could not be more wrong, bless their hearts. We could start with the historical record as found in Luke 1:46-80. But maybe the Magnificat isn’t good enough for Christians in America, who don’t even know how to spell exilic let alone know they are in it. Then there is Jim Wallis’ recent article on the true meaning of Christmas, in full below.
Each Advent in recent years, around the time when those prefab, do-it-yourself gingerbread house kits appear on supermarket shelves, Fox News launches its (allegedly) defensive campaign commonly known as the “War on Christmas.”
Fox News’ “war” is designed to criticize the “secularization” of our culture wrought by atheists, agnostics, liberals, leftists, progressives, and separation of church and state zealots— i.e. Democrats. This irreligious coalition force is allegedly waging a strategic offensive on Christmas, trying to banish the sacred symbols of the season, denying our religious heritage, and even undermining the spiritual rubrics upon which our great nation is built.
Fox News positions itself as the defender of the faith and all things sacred. And Bill O’Reilly fancies himself the “watchdog” of Christmas.
Fox News’ usual targets include shopping malls and stores that replace their “Merry Christmas” greetings with “Happy Holidays,” and state governments that no longer call their official “Christmas” trees by their rightful name, or municipalities that ban any depictions of, or references to, the Christmas season in public places. Those who are attacked defend themselves, often claim that they are really religious too, and the perennial war is on.
But what we actually have here is a theological problem, where cultural and commercial symbols are confused with truly Christian ones, and the meaning of the holy season is missed all together.
The war on Christmas is really about what brand of “civil religion” America should have. The particular (read: biblical) meaning of Christmas, for Christians, has almost nothing to do with the media war.
What a surprise.
What is Christmas? It is the celebration of the Incarnation, God’s becoming flesh — human — and entering into history in the form of a vulnerable baby born to a poor, teenage mother in a dirty animal stall. Simply amazing. That Mary was homeless at the time,a member of a people oppressed by the imperial power of an occupied country whose local political leader, Herod, was so threatened by the baby’s birth that he killed countless children in a vain attempt to destroy the Christ child, all adds compelling historical and political context to the Advent season.
The theological claim that sets Christianity apart from any other faith tradition is the Incarnation. God has come into the world to save us. God became like us to bring us back to God and show us what it means to be truly human.
That is the meaning of the Incarnation. That is the reason for the season.
In Jesus Christ, God hits the streets.
It is theologically and spiritually significant that the Incarnation came to our poorest streets. That Jesus was born poor, later announces his mission at Nazareth as “bringing good news to the poor,” and finally tells us that how we treat “the least of these” is his measure of how we treat him and how he will judge us as the Son of God, radically defines the social context and meaning of the Incarnation of God in Christ. And it clearly reveals the real meaning of Christmas.
The other explicit message of the Incarnation is that Jesus the Christ’s arrival will mean “peace on earth, good will toward men.” He is “the mighty God, the everlasting Father, and the Prince of Peace.” Jesus later calls on his disciples to turn the other cheek, practice humility, walk the extra mile, put away their swords, love their neighbors — and even their enemies — and says that in his kingdom, it is the peacemakers who will be called the children of God. Christ will end our warring ways, bringing reconciliation to God and to one another.
None of that has anything to do with the Fox News Christmas. In fact, quite the opposite.
Making sure that shopping malls and stores greet their customers with “Merry Christmas” is entirely irrelevant to the meaning of the Incarnation. In reality it is the consumer frenzy of Christmas shopping that is the real affront and threat to the season.
Last year, Americans spent $450 billion on Christmas. Clean water for the whole world, including every poor person on the planet, would cost about $20 billion. Let’s just call that what it is: A material blasphemy of the Christmas season.
Imagine Jesus walking into the mall, seeing the Merry Christmas signs, and expressing his humble thanks for how the pre- and post-Christmas sales are honoring to him. How about credit cards for Christ?
While we’re at it, here’s another point of clarification: The arrival of the Christ child has nothing to do with trees or what we call them.
Evergreens and wreaths, holly and ivy, and even mistletoe turn out to be customs borrowed from ancient Roman and Germanic winter solstice celebrations, assimilated and co-opted by the church after Constantine made peace between his empire and the Christians.
Now, my family loves our Christmas tree, but its bright lights and wonderful ornaments don’t teach my children much about why Jesus came into the world. We do that in other ways, such as giving needed gifts — goats, sheep, and chickens and the like — to the poorest children and families of the world though the World Vision web site on Christmas Day. The goal is to make our sons more excited about the gifts they give than the ones they get, and it usually works. Last year, my boys sponsored a child in Ghana.
I have no problem with the public viewing of symbols from all of the world’s religions at appropriate times in their religious calendars (which can actually be educational for all of our children) and believe that doing so is consistent with our democratic and cultural pluralism.
Wallis, of course, is heavily influenced here by Thomas Merton’s famous essay found in Merton’s Raids on the Unspeakable. Enjoy, and Merry Christmas!



Bill Gram-Reefer is Editor & Publisher of Halfway To Concord, founded in 2004. Halfway To Concord is the leading online source for community-driven political news, events, and opinion for Contra Costa County and the San Francisco East Bay.
{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }
It is not just that Christmas has been trivialized by our selfish materialism. It has also been trivialized by the church itself. The cyclical sentimentality of our Christmas celebration obscures the audacious news of the herald angels. “For, this day, is born to you a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord, in the city of David.” (Luke 2:11).
John makes the statement more incredulously. The Creator of the cosmos, the light of universe, the very life force of all creation came into the world. “He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.” (John 1:10) How could this be? The one who existed before existence, who created the cosmos out of nothing “was made flesh, and dwelt among us”. (John 1:14)
Even with the revelation of the law, the Scriptures and the prophets, we can barely comprehend God. Looking face to face at his very image, we could not recognize Him. Our lights burn so dim and our images are so faded and tarnished that, He was a stranger in the very world that he made.
But despite our indifference and neglect, He came to us bearing gifts – grace, truth and the offer of adoption as God’s own children. The question is whether we will receive this audacious gift of love, grace and redemption – and then live our lives as children of God.
Wallis makes some good points, but he is wrong when he says; “making sure that shopping malls and stores greet their customers with “Merry Christmas” is entirely irrelevant to the meaning of the Incarnation.”
Bill O’Reiley is doing God’s work when he highlights the secularist effort to take Christ out of Christmas. Some people may go a whole year without considering the message or meaning of the Incarnation, but the simple word “Christmas” helps remind people if just for a moment that the love of God did become flesh.
Merton is a Catholic mystic that teaches contemplative spirituality. Nothing biblical here…
Jim Wallis is a social justice, “missional” teacher and supported communist rebels in central america. A true “wolf in sheeps clothing”.
http://firstjohnfourfive.wordpress.com/2010/04/10/jim-wallis-another-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing/
Mary and Joseph were not “poor” necessarily. They WERE looking for lodging at the Inn but were turned away since they obviously arrived later than most and the town was full. It says NOWHERE in scripture that Mary was “homeless”. They were traveling to take part in the census and needed a place to stay while there.
“Children of God” – You don’t become COG unless you are born again. Being a “peacemaker” doesn’t make you a COG. Peacemakers can be COG but not all COG are peacemakers. Putting your faith and trust in Christ as saviour and acknowledging you are a sinner in the presence of Almighty God and you deserve His wrath makes you a COG. Later turning from your sin sets you on the process of sanctification as you are justified by faith and then sanctified until the Lord takes you home. When you are a COG you have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit as represented in Romans…
Romans 8:
Heirs with Christ
12 So then, brothers, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. 13 For if you live according to the flesh you will die, but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. 14 For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. 15 For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, “Abba! Father!” 16 The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God, 17 and if children, then heirs—heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him.
Jim Wallis and his sojourers magazine and teaching are very “missional” in their theology. He has on many occasions taken liberty (as in this article) to “gild the lily” in reading meaning where there isn’t any.
Read on and see his real agenda…
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/spirituality/lighthousetrails/010/6-wallis.htm