<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: CD-10 Livermore Exit Poll</title> <atom:link href="http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/cd-10-livermore-exit-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/cd-10-livermore-exit-poll/</link> <description>California Political News, Contra Costa and East Bay</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Walter Stanley</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/cd-10-livermore-exit-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-5235</link> <dc:creator>Walter Stanley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:09:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13637#comment-5235</guid> <description>1:10 AM - FINAL Districtwide Results in #CD10 - Garamendi 53% (66,311); Harmer 43% (53,441); All precincts reporting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1:10 AM &#8211; FINAL Districtwide Results in #CD10 &#8211; Garamendi 53% (66,311); Harmer 43% (53,441); All precincts reporting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Walter Stanley</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/cd-10-livermore-exit-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link> <dc:creator>Walter Stanley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:08:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13637#comment-5233</guid> <description>12:10 AM - Updated Districtwide Results in CD10 - Garamendi 53% (65,969); Harmer 43% (53,103); 253 of 273 precincts reporting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12:10 AM &#8211; Updated Districtwide Results in CD10 &#8211; Garamendi 53% (65,969); Harmer 43% (53,103); 253 of 273 precincts reporting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Walter Stanley</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/cd-10-livermore-exit-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-5232</link> <dc:creator>Walter Stanley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:45:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13637#comment-5232</guid> <description>11:30 PM – Districtwide Results in CD10 – Garamendi 53% (57,002 votes); Harmer 42% (44,844 votes) – 188 of 273 precincts reporting.*On a side note:The final results in Alameda County were as follows- Harmer 52% (7,276 votes); Garamendi 45% (6,281 votes); Cloward 1% (174 votes); Denham 1% (134 votes); McIlroy 1% (124 votes).With the exception of 3rd place Cloward and 4th place Denham the Halfway to Concord poll was fairly accurate.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11:30 PM – Districtwide Results in CD10 – Garamendi 53% (57,002 votes); Harmer 42% (44,844 votes) – 188 of 273 precincts reporting.</p><p>*On a side note:</p><p>The final results in Alameda County were as follows- Harmer 52% (7,276 votes); Garamendi 45% (6,281 votes); Cloward 1% (174 votes); Denham 1% (134 votes); McIlroy 1% (124 votes).</p><p>With the exception of 3rd place Cloward and 4th place Denham the Halfway to Concord poll was fairly accurate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Walter Stanley</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/cd-10-livermore-exit-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-5225</link> <dc:creator>Walter Stanley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 05:17:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13637#comment-5225</guid> <description>9:16 PM - Districtwide Results in CD10 - Garamendi 56% (42,608 votes); Harmer 40% (30,015 votes) - 78 of 273 precincts reporting.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9:16 PM &#8211; Districtwide Results in CD10 &#8211; Garamendi 56% (42,608 votes); Harmer 40% (30,015 votes) &#8211; 78 of 273 precincts reporting.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc

Served from: www.halfwaytoconcord.com @ 2010-03-16 10:35:31 -->