<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Alameda GOP is Anti-War?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/</link> <description>California Political News, Contra Costa and East Bay</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Walter Stanley</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5497</link> <dc:creator>Walter Stanley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13700#comment-5497</guid> <description>Wendy,Just because I don&#039;t totally agree with the Reagan foreign policy doesn&#039;t mean that I can&#039;t quote his comments relating conservatism to libertarianism when the topic of libertarian lenaing Republicans comes up.And if I told someone that Reagan was a great President, that doesn&#039;t mean that I support amnesty for illegal aliens either, as I&#039;m sure you would agree.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy,</p><p>Just because I don&#8217;t totally agree with the Reagan foreign policy doesn&#8217;t mean that I can&#8217;t quote his comments relating conservatism to libertarianism when the topic of libertarian lenaing Republicans comes up.</p><p>And if I told someone that Reagan was a great President, that doesn&#8217;t mean that I support amnesty for illegal aliens either, as I&#8217;m sure you would agree.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wendy Lack</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5456</link> <dc:creator>Wendy Lack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13700#comment-5456</guid> <description>Walter, it&#039;s ironic that you would quote RR, inasmuch as his presidency did not follow your definition of a &quot;constitutional foreign policy.&quot;Many of us libertarian-leaning Republicans can and do question various aspects of military decisions, our nation&#039;s , our foreign policy and actions by the U.S. way-left-leaning state department.  It&#039;s just that we don&#039;t accept that the isolationist bent of this resolution is the best strategic path forward.As do so many others, I, too, have family members serving in an active duty capacity in the military -- and would like nothing better than to see our troops come safely home NOW.However, to bring home troops now would be tantamount to ceding Iraq back to enemies of freedom -- which would serve neither our national interests, nor those of our allies, nor certainly the interests of the majority of Iraqi people who are relishing improved living conditions and grateful for the efforts and stabilizing presence of the U.S.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter, it&#8217;s ironic that you would quote RR, inasmuch as his presidency did not follow your definition of a &#8220;constitutional foreign policy.&#8221;</p><p>Many of us libertarian-leaning Republicans can and do question various aspects of military decisions, our nation&#8217;s , our foreign policy and actions by the U.S. way-left-leaning state department.  It&#8217;s just that we don&#8217;t accept that the isolationist bent of this resolution is the best strategic path forward.</p><p>As do so many others, I, too, have family members serving in an active duty capacity in the military &#8212; and would like nothing better than to see our troops come safely home NOW.</p><p>However, to bring home troops now would be tantamount to ceding Iraq back to enemies of freedom &#8212; which would serve neither our national interests, nor those of our allies, nor certainly the interests of the majority of Iraqi people who are relishing improved living conditions and grateful for the efforts and stabilizing presence of the U.S.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle Vallone</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5455</link> <dc:creator>Kyle Vallone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13700#comment-5455</guid> <description>I give Walter credit for standing by his beliefs. The fact that we are in two wars and we are unwilling to either put the country on a war footing and win them or get out speaks for it self.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give Walter credit for standing by his beliefs. The fact that we are in two wars and we are unwilling to either put the country on a war footing and win them or get out speaks for it self.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Walter Stanley</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5449</link> <dc:creator>Walter Stanley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:52:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13700#comment-5449</guid> <description>&quot;BP&quot; that&#039;s a bunch of BS!Remember what Ronald Reagan said?&quot;I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.&quot; -Ronald Reagan</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BP&#8221; that&#8217;s a bunch of BS!</p><p>Remember what Ronald Reagan said?</p><p>&#8220;I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is.&#8221; -Ronald Reagan</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BP</title><link>http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/alameda-gop-is-anti-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5448</link> <dc:creator>BP</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:26:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.halfwaytoconcord.com/?p=13700#comment-5448</guid> <description>Well thought out resolution?
This is pathetic. Whoever Wendy is she is the ONLY post on this site that makes sense.
The only Rinos are you Libertarians posing as Republicans.  The only thing a Libertarian is IS a fiscally conservative Democrat.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thought out resolution?<br
/> This is pathetic. Whoever Wendy is she is the ONLY post on this site that makes sense.<br
/> The only Rinos are you Libertarians posing as Republicans.  The only thing a Libertarian is IS a fiscally conservative Democrat.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.halfwaytoconcord.com

Served from: www.halfwaytoconcord.com @ 2010-03-21 06:26:47 -->